The development of Internet Protocol Television
(IPTV) services is quickly becoming a central strategy for
major telecom operators, with Asia and Europe leading the industry in
terms of network deployments and customer adoption.
Unlike ordinary Internet video services that stream or download
highly compressed video to a PC screen, IPTV systems deliver
highquality standard-definition and high-definition (HD) video
content in real-time to more demanding displays, such as large-screen
TVs. This requires a stable and reliable high-bandwidth network
infrastructure.
IPTV system deployments usually drive major upgrades to the network
infrastructure to meet these requirements. They also demand new test
and monitoring technologies to test and maintain that infrastructure.
Several telecom operators have delayed or scaled down their IPTV
systems until they are able to pinpoint the cause of system problems
that degrade the quality of the IPTV service delivered to their
customers. Improved IPTV test and measurement technologies are then
necessary to accelerate the commercial deployment and growth of IPTV
services.
Tuning in to IPTV
IPTV was conceived in the mid- 1990s by Gerry Pond, then CEO of NBTel,
as a platform that would enable the company and its industry peers to
penetrate the entertainment services business and leapfrog the existing
services delivered via satellite, coaxial cable and terrestrial
broadcast.
The use of IP was hotly debated by designers due to the inherent
challenge of delivering high-quality video at constant bit rates on a
technology best suited to support data communications.
This debate still continues to some degree today, but the compelling
fact then and now is that IP provides engineers and service providers
with unmatched flexibility to develop and launch new products and
features that many consider are essential to win and keep customers in
an increasingly competitive entertainment market.
After a three-year R&D program involving several technology
partners, NBTel launched the first IPTV system into commercial service
in 1999. The service, branded Vibe Vision, has attracted customers away
from cable TV - partly due to customer interest in its IP-enabled
features, such as TV-based Web access, e-mail, content navigation and
digital picture quality.
Within a few months, the service was adopted by 5 percent of
households in the serviced market, making it one of the fastest growing
services released by a telecom operator.
As more customers switched to the IPTV service, the importance of
core video quality and reliability rose steadily. However, numerous
failure modes were not detected by existing network monitoring tools.
Likewise, the available helpdesk tools fell short in dealing with key
customer impacting network problems.
Over the past three years, a growing number of telecom operators
have announced plans to introduce and market IPTV services to increase
and defend core telephony revenues.
But despite high-profile trials and significant investments in
network infrastructure, less than 5 million households worldwide use
IPTV services today. Many network operators have had to delay service
launches or constrain the marketing of the service due to ongoing
challenges with service quality and reliability.
 |
| Figure
1: A simple IPTV end-to-end system has signal acquisition, video
encoding and compression, middleware, transport, access and home
network including one or more STBs. |
Service issues
To better understand the IPTV service quality problem, let's review a
simplified model of an IPTV network. Figure
1 above shows a typical end-to-end system encompassing signal
acquisition, video encoding and compression, middleware, transport,
access, and a home network, including one or more STBs.
IPTV services impose critical demands on video encoders, transport
networks, home network devices and higher-layer applications,
especially middleware and video-on-demand (VoD)
applications. The challenges associated with each of these subsystems
are discussed in detail as follows:
Signal acquisition and head-end. Since most of the video content
available today is intended for distribution over satellite or cable TV
networks, it is typically delivered to the telco head-end as a variable
bit rate service with bandwidth spikes exceeding the available capacity
on the IPTV network.
The telco head-end must convert this variable bit rate content into
a compressed constant bit rate service. Generally, the bandwidth
reserved for each channel of standard-definition content is in the
range of 3Mbps, while HD content requires five to six times this
bandwidth. Newer compression systems can reduce this bandwidth
requirement by up to 50 percent.
This degree of compression and processing requires careful tuning of
up to 20 discrete parameters on each encoder and there are often
several hundred channels available in IPTV systems. Once an optimal
encoder profile is established, it must be maintained to account for
ongoing changes in the video path upstream of the telco head-end.
IP transport and distribution networks. On exiting the head-end, the
video payload, comprising 50- 250 channels of linear broadcast traffic,
is transported to regional distribution centers and then to local
central offices. The broadcast payload, excluding overheads, ranges up
to 750Mbps. Including overheads and VoD content, the aggregate
distributed bandwidth requirement can easily exceed 1Gbps.
The supporting IP infrastructure includes switches, routers, radius,
DNS and DHCP servers, firewalls, load
balancers, cache servers, and directory servers.
Network jitter is currently the subject of considerable interest as
a source of video impairment. However, since equipment vendors adapt
their products to support video traffic, jitter performance has
steadily improved. Likewise, STBs have become more resilient to network
jitter due to continued expansion of video buffers.
A key challenge in the IP infrastructure is ensuring adequate
capacity and performance as the network evolves to expand service
areas, introduce new features and add customers. This requires strict
control of changes to the network, particularly as new technologies or
new versions of existing technologies are introduced into production.
Access and home networks. The last mile, home network and STB
constitute the largest component counts in the IPTV system. In these
network segments, there is minimal application of automated failover
devices.
The last mile and home networks are subject to a greater range of
environmental impacts. Moreover, the service may be negatively impacted
by consumer actions and by field technicians who are not even aware
that they are affecting the IPTV service as they perform maintenance on
the telephony network, which also serves IPTV.
STBs and their on-board software are key components in the delivery
of the IPTV service. In addition to their video decode functions, STBs
usually maintain program guide data, manage middleware transactions and
signal channel changes, and support the user interface.
Several issues may impact STB operation. Aspects such as
packet loss, various MPEG errors and
versioning problems typically contribute to video problems for the
consumer.
 |
| Table
1: The subsystems in the network have specific video test and
measurement requirements. |
Table 1 above summarizes the
test and measurement requirements associated with each of the major
subsystems in the IPTV network.
Broadband IP network technologies and products are rapidly evolving
to meet the unique challenges of IPTV. Combined with rigorous network
change control procedures, current developments in passive IPTV test
and monitoring technologies and emerging end-to-end video monitoring
systems are expected to accelerate the deployment and improve
scalability of IPTV systems while maintaining essential video quality
and reliability.
Curtis Howe is President and CEO
and Marc Savoie is VP of Product Development at Mariner
Partners Inc. To read a PDF
version of this story, go to "Implement
large-scale IPTV systems."